Things Are Not Knowledge (GS): 10-24-2026

1. If things are knowledge, then how can they exist without knowledge of them?
2. If things are knowledge, then why doesn’t incorrect knowledge of them destroy them?
3. If things are knowledge, then why doesn’t incomplete knowledge of them destroy them?
4. If things are knowledge, then why don’t they change when knowledge about them changes?
5. If things are knowledge, then can they exist for an individual lacking correct knowledge of them?
6. If things are knowledge, then how can they be all the diverse and varying knowledge about them without structural damage and destruction?
7. If things are knowledge, then how can they be all the competing and conflicting knowledge about them without internal conflicts that must destroy and fragment them?